Dr Conrad is an unusual man in both financial and professional pursuits. One of his previous endeavours was his involvement with a bogus masonic lodge known as the "United Most Worshipful Scottish Rite Grand Lodge of Texas, A.F.& A.M." This group is well recognised as being irregular. This was set up with the intention, I believe, to take money from people. Dr Murray is NOT AN ACCEPTED OR REGULAR FREEMASON of any regular lodge. In short, he is not a freemason. Merely a self-proclaimed one. Do not confuse the two.This fact can quite easily be verified by simply Googling the name of the organisation.
All the excuses... oh, must be 'photoshopped'. Oh, must be an 'irregular' mason. Oh, you must be an idiot.
First, this Dr. always looks as if he's been helping himself to whatever he has prescribed to his patients. Rather like a 'willing dupe'. And, for those who would say 'hey, just ask us Masons and we'll be happy to tell you if Conrad or anyone else is a real mason or not'... well then, why do you not publish the names of ALL members of your organization. And all previous members and all who were members up to their death? Why so afraid of the light of day?
This guy is not a member of the worldwide fraternity known as the Freemasons. He is a member of some group with less than 500 members that call themselves "masonic," but who have no ties to and are not recognized by real masons (the terms "mason" and "freemason" are not copyrighted or trademarked, so any organization can call themselves "masonic").
THE MASONIC ORGANISATION THAT YOU GUYS A TALKING ABOUT IS A FOR REAL THEY HAVE BEEN AROUND SINCE 1877 AND HAS OVER 8000 MEMBERS ALONE IN TEXAS BUT HAS GRAND LODGES IN EVERY STATE.
I do like The king of Pops music but say the Doc, mason or not is the one to blame for his death, I say NO. For you who don't know someone or something, stop jugging and focus on your self.
Hahahaha Why would freemasonary be intrestred in having michael jackson killed? i know someone thats a mason, he works for charity and the lodge hes a member of is raising hundreds of thouands every year for people being abused. Nothing is black or white, and freemasonary should be questioned like everything else, but i doubt hardly that they would be involved in M death. It is very little secrets about freemason, its more rumers about it then facts becasue people are to lazy to look up facts. How many of you have actually any conections or insight in masonary? at least they'r not hypocrits like the church.
REGULARITY AND RECOGNITION INTRODUCTION 1. The regularity and recognition of Grand Lodges are separate but allied subjects. Unless a Grand Lodge is regular, it cannot be recognised. Unless a Grand Lodge is recognised, its Brethren cannot (or should not) be met as Freemasons by Brethren of regular and recognised Grand Lodges. BASIC PRINCIPLES 2. The "Basic Principles for Grand Lodge Recognition" were adopted by Grand Lodge in 1929. This was a codification, and not a statement of new principles. summarised the tests which the United Grand Lodge of England had applied and would apply in recognising regular Grand Lodges throughout the World. Eight principles are set out in 'the Book of Constitutions, and restated in Grand Lodge's leaflet "Freemasonry's External Relations" To be eligible for recognition, a Grand Lodge must a. be regular in its origin (see paragraph 3 below) b. be truly independent and self-governing (see paragraph 4 below) c. adhere to 'landmarks' (a landmark is an essential characteristic of regular Freemasonry), viz: (I) its Brethren must believe in a Supreme Being (the GAOTU); (ii) Obligations must be taken on or in full view of the VSL; (iii) it must display the three Great Lights of Freemasonry when it or its Lodges are open; (iv) discussion of religion and politics in its Lodges must be prohibited, and (v) its membership must be male, and it must have nothing to do with mixed or women's Lodges. REGULARITY OF ORIGIN 3. The original Grand Lodges (England, Ireland and Scotland) were formed by private Lodges which had formed themselves Time immemorial Lodges, in English parlance. the 18th Century, three State Grand Lodges in the United States of America were formed by two Lodges, and one was formed by a Grand Convention of Masons Subsequent Grand Lodges follow the modern rule in paragraph 4.
4. A Grand Lodge must have been established by: a) a recognised Grand Lodge, or b) three (nowadays) or more regularly constituted private Lodges, formed in accordance within the rules and customs of a regular Grand Lodge.
5. A Grand Lodge must have undisputed authority over Craft (or basic) Freemasonry within its jurisdiction, and not be subject in any way to or share power with any other Masonic body.
6. This principle is expressed overseas as exclusive Territorial jurisdiction, but has recently been qualified as being "subject to exceptions" This qualification means the principle is not violated if Grand Lodges agree to share territory while remaining authority over Brethren under their jurisdiction (e.g., our recognition of four Grand Lodges in Colombia; the acceptance of the Grand Lodges of New Zealand and South Africa (etc.) of Lodges under the UGLE (etc.) in their territory, and the fact that Lodges under the Grand Lodge of the State of Washington work in the territory of the Grand Lodge of Alaska). Agreement by one Grand Lodge to share its territory with another does not imply license for other Grand Lodges to insert Lodges into the territory of the first Grand Lodge.
7. England's view, of jurisdiction over the Brethren in its constitution regardless of where their Lodges meet, has the merit of simplicity, and is compatible with the territorial view described above. In practice, England does not ignore territorial sovereignty when it considers recognition. RECOGNITION 8. Recognition is a series of bi-lateral relationships between Grand Lodges. If a Grand Lodge seeks recognition from England, and in due course is recognised, the mutual recognition between it and England cannot bind a third Grand Lodge.
9. England's recent policy on recognition has been described as needing to be convinced that it should be granted, rather than noting an absence of reasons why it should no
Anyone Involved in Masonic secret societies whether there a TRUE freemason or not are KNOWINGLY carrying out the duties of lucifer. they are all satan worshippers of some kind and generate wealth out of manipulation and fear of the people! think about it, this guy is gna have a nice 4 years in prison and then generate massive amounts of cash from interviews and TV shows when released.
oh and buy the way....if this is the work of photoshop the real picture surely would have been found and uploaded by now by some doubting little twat that wants to go against everyone else's word...don't you think? You have to remember that there are THOUSAND5 AND THOUSAND5 of masons around the world so now you know who's saying "photoshop, or your and idiot or that's stupid" without any proof what so ever to support there statements. The Internet is the only medium they do not control so the only way they can Impact on it is by non-stop nay-saying and psycops tactics on forums, comments and so on.
Actuarlly i believe what la toya believes i think mj was murdered by the illuminate who i think a partners with the freemasons but i think the freemasons are a higher posetion than being in the illuminate. we will miss you MJ alot , but i hope that you are in heaven then ill know iil meet you soon.
Come on, guys, why would any freemason -if regular or not- have any interest in killing MJ..? That's riddiculous... ^^ Face the fact that Jackson was a brilliant musician but a junkie as well. It was his addiction to the fuckin' narcotics obviously...
By the way: where do you believe to know from all the ridiculous "facts" about freemasonry..? *lol*
REGULARITY AND RECOGNITION INTRODUCTION 1. The regularity and recognition of Grand Lodges are separate but allied subjects. Unless a Grand Lodge is regular, it cannot be recognised. Unless a Grand Lodge is recognised, its Brethren cannot (or should not) be met as Freemasons by Brethren of regular and recognised Grand Lodges. BASIC PRINCIPLES 2. The "Basic Principles for Grand Lodge Recognition" were adopted by Grand Lodge in 1929. This was a codification, and not a statement of new principles. summarised the tests which the United Grand Lodge of England had applied and would apply in recognising regular Grand Lodges throughout the World. Eight principles are set out in 'the Book of Constitutions, and restated in Grand Lodge's leaflet "Freemasonry's External Relations" To be eligible for recognition, a Grand Lodge must a. be regular in its origin (see paragraph 3 below) b. be truly independent and self-governing (see paragraph 4 below) c. adhere to 'landmarks' (a landmark is an essential characteristic of regular Freemasonry), viz: (I) its Brethren must believe in a Supreme Being (the GAOTU); (ii) Obligations must be taken on or in full view of the VSL; (iii) it must display the three Great Lights of Freemasonry when it or its Lodges are open; (iv) discussion of religion and politics in its Lodges must be prohibited, and (v) its membership must be male, and it must have nothing to do with mixed or women's Lodges. REGULARITY OF ORIGIN 3. The original Grand Lodges (England, Ireland and Scotland) were formed by private Lodges which had formed themselves Time immemorial Lodges, in English parlance. the 18th Century, three State Grand Lodges in the United States of America were formed by two Lodges, and one was formed by a Grand Convention of Masons Subsequent Grand Lodges follow the modern rule in paragraph 4. 4. A Grand Lodge must have been established by: a) a recognised Grand Lodge, or b) three (nowadays) or more regularly constituted private Lodges, formed in accordance within the rules and customs of a regular Grand Lodge. 5. A Grand Lodge must have undisputed authority over Craft (or basic) Freemasonry within its jurisdiction, and not be subject in any way to or share power with any other Masonic body. 6. This principle is expressed overseas as exclusive Territorial jurisdiction, but has recently been qualified as being "subject to exceptions" This qualification means the principle is not violated if Grand Lodges agree to share territory while remaining authority over Brethren under their jurisdiction (e.g., our recognition of four Grand Lodges in Colombia; the acceptance of the Grand Lodges of New Zealand and South Africa (etc.) of Lodges under the UGLE (etc.) in their territory, and the fact that Lodges under the Grand Lodge of the State of Washington work in the territory of the Grand Lodge of Alaska). Agreement by one Grand Lodge to share its territory with another does not imply license for other Grand Lodges to insert Lodges into the territory of the first Grand Lodge. 7. England's view, of jurisdiction over the Brethren in its constitution regardless of where their Lodges meet, has the merit of simplicity, and is compatible with the territorial view described above. In practice, England does not ignore territorial sovereignty when it considers recognition. RECOGNITION 8. Recognition is a series of bi-lateral relationships between Grand Lodges. If a Grand Lodge seeks recognition from England, and in due course is recognised, the mutual recognition between it and England cannot bind a third Grand Lodge. 9. England's recent policy on recognition has been described as needing to be convinced that it should be granted, rather than noting an absence of reasons why it should no
Michael Jackson knew he was gonna die therefore he was ready to claim his spot on the throne like it or nit wtf you think the tour was name (This is It) the fact that he died at 50 yrs is a little debatable ikr,but like La'Toya & Paris & Katherine said MJ stated that "They're gonna kill me for what I love" MJ knew it was his time.The plot was set and Conrad Murray took the blame (Maybe you should consider another Power Force) snuck right before are eyes and SET A PERFECT PLOT.#1Luv
clearly murdered by illumanti!
ReplyDeleteSeems photo-shopped to me.
ReplyDeleteHe is the doctor of jackson. I can't believe this.
ReplyDeleteLa Toya is still sticking to her story that Michael told her, if anything happened, he was murdered!!! OUCH!
ReplyDeleteDr Conrad is an unusual man in both financial and professional pursuits. One of his previous endeavours was his involvement with a bogus masonic lodge known as the "United Most Worshipful Scottish Rite Grand Lodge of Texas, A.F.& A.M." This group is well recognised as being irregular. This was set up with the intention, I believe, to take money from people. Dr Murray is NOT AN ACCEPTED OR REGULAR FREEMASON of any regular lodge. In short, he is not a freemason. Merely a self-proclaimed one. Do not confuse the two.This fact can quite easily be verified by simply Googling the name of the organisation.
ReplyDeleteAll the excuses... oh, must be 'photoshopped'.
ReplyDeleteOh, must be an 'irregular' mason.
Oh, you must be an idiot.
First, this Dr. always looks as if he's been helping himself to whatever he has prescribed to his patients. Rather like a 'willing dupe'.
And, for those who would say 'hey, just ask us Masons and we'll be happy to tell you if Conrad or anyone else is a real mason or not'... well then, why do you not publish the names of ALL members of your organization. And all previous members and all who were members up to their death? Why so afraid of the light of day?
This guy is not a member of the worldwide fraternity known as the Freemasons. He is a member of some group with less than 500 members that call themselves "masonic," but who have no ties to and are not recognized by real masons (the terms "mason" and "freemason" are not copyrighted or trademarked, so any organization can call themselves "masonic").
ReplyDeletegreat post
ReplyDeleteTHE MASONIC ORGANISATION THAT YOU GUYS A TALKING ABOUT IS A FOR REAL THEY HAVE BEEN AROUND SINCE 1877 AND HAS OVER 8000 MEMBERS ALONE IN TEXAS BUT HAS GRAND LODGES IN EVERY STATE.
ReplyDeleteDistroy all Masonic lodges!
ReplyDeleteIt's photoshop
ReplyDeleteIs this man a real Mason?
ReplyDeleteSIMPLY PUT NO: IF HE ISN'T PRINCE HALL, THEN HE'S 4 DAMN SURE NOT AF&AM OF LEGITIMATE ORGIN.
ReplyDeleteI do like The king of Pops music but say the Doc, mason or not is the one to blame for his death, I say NO. For you who don't know someone or something, stop jugging and focus on your self.
ReplyDeleteHahahaha Why would freemasonary be intrestred in having michael jackson killed? i know someone thats a mason, he works for charity and the lodge hes a member of is raising hundreds of thouands every year for people being abused. Nothing is black or white, and freemasonary should be questioned like everything else, but i doubt hardly that they would be involved in M death. It is very little secrets about freemason, its more rumers about it then facts becasue people are to lazy to look up facts. How many of you have actually any conections or insight in masonary? at least they'r not hypocrits like the church.
ReplyDeleteBOGUS GRAND LODGES
ReplyDeleteIN TEXAS
http://www.thephylaxis.org/bogus/bogus_tx.php
REGULARITY AND RECOGNITION
ReplyDeleteINTRODUCTION
1. The regularity and recognition of Grand Lodges are separate but allied subjects. Unless a Grand Lodge is regular, it cannot be recognised. Unless a Grand Lodge is recognised, its Brethren cannot (or should not) be met as Freemasons by Brethren of regular and recognised Grand Lodges.
BASIC PRINCIPLES
2. The "Basic Principles for Grand Lodge Recognition" were adopted by Grand Lodge in 1929. This was a codification, and not a statement of new principles. summarised the tests which the United Grand Lodge of England had applied and would apply in recognising regular Grand Lodges throughout the World. Eight principles are set out in 'the Book of Constitutions, and restated in Grand Lodge's leaflet "Freemasonry's External Relations" To be eligible for recognition, a Grand Lodge must
a. be regular in its origin (see paragraph 3 below)
b. be truly independent and self-governing (see paragraph 4 below)
c. adhere to 'landmarks' (a landmark is an essential characteristic of regular Freemasonry), viz:
(I) its Brethren must believe in a Supreme Being (the GAOTU);
(ii) Obligations must be taken on or in full view of the VSL;
(iii) it must display the three Great Lights of Freemasonry when it or its Lodges are open;
(iv) discussion of religion and politics in its Lodges must be prohibited, and
(v) its membership must be male, and it must have nothing to do with mixed or women's Lodges.
REGULARITY OF ORIGIN
3. The original Grand Lodges (England, Ireland and Scotland) were formed by private Lodges which had formed themselves Time immemorial Lodges, in English parlance. the 18th Century, three State Grand Lodges in the United States of America were formed by two Lodges, and one was formed by a Grand Convention of Masons Subsequent Grand Lodges follow the modern rule in paragraph 4.
4. A Grand Lodge must have been established by: a) a recognised Grand Lodge, or b) three (nowadays) or more regularly constituted private Lodges, formed in accordance within the rules and customs of a regular Grand Lodge.
5. A Grand Lodge must have undisputed authority over Craft (or basic) Freemasonry within its jurisdiction, and not be subject in any way to or share power with any other Masonic body.
6. This principle is expressed overseas as exclusive Territorial jurisdiction, but has recently been qualified as being "subject to exceptions" This qualification means the principle is not violated if Grand Lodges agree to share territory while remaining authority over Brethren under their jurisdiction (e.g., our recognition of four Grand Lodges in Colombia; the acceptance of the Grand Lodges of New Zealand and South Africa (etc.) of Lodges under the UGLE (etc.) in their territory, and the fact that Lodges under the Grand Lodge of the State of Washington work in the territory of the Grand Lodge of Alaska). Agreement by one Grand Lodge to share its territory with another does not imply license for other Grand Lodges to insert Lodges into the territory of the first Grand Lodge.
7. England's view, of jurisdiction over the Brethren in its constitution regardless of where their Lodges meet, has the merit of simplicity, and is compatible with the territorial view described above. In practice, England does not ignore territorial sovereignty when it considers recognition.
RECOGNITION
8. Recognition is a series of bi-lateral relationships between Grand Lodges. If a Grand Lodge seeks recognition from England, and in due course is recognised, the mutual recognition between it and England cannot bind a third Grand Lodge.
9. England's recent policy on recognition has been described as needing to be convinced that it should be granted, rather than noting an absence of reasons why it should no
Anyone Involved in Masonic secret societies whether there a TRUE freemason or not are KNOWINGLY carrying out the duties of lucifer.
ReplyDeletethey are all satan worshippers of some kind and generate wealth out of manipulation and fear of the people! think about it, this guy is gna have a nice 4 years in prison and then generate massive amounts of cash from interviews and TV shows when released.
oh and buy the way....if this is the work of photoshop the real picture surely would have been found and uploaded by now by some doubting little twat that wants to go against everyone else's word...don't you think? You have to remember that there are THOUSAND5 AND THOUSAND5 of masons around the world so now you know who's saying "photoshop, or your and idiot or that's stupid" without any proof what so ever to support there statements. The Internet is the only medium they do not control so the only way they can Impact on it is by non-stop nay-saying and psycops tactics on forums, comments and so on.
ReplyDeletethis pic is defenently photo shoped look at the right (left ) shoulder the collar is not sitting right
ReplyDeleteActuarlly i believe what la toya believes i think mj was murdered by the illuminate who i think a partners with the freemasons but i think the freemasons are a higher posetion than being in the illuminate. we will miss you MJ alot , but i hope that you are in heaven then ill know iil meet you soon.
ReplyDeleteCome on, guys, why would any freemason -if regular or not- have any interest in killing MJ..? That's riddiculous... ^^
ReplyDeleteFace the fact that Jackson was a brilliant musician but a junkie as well. It was his addiction to the fuckin' narcotics obviously...
By the way: where do you believe to know from all the ridiculous "facts" about freemasonry..? *lol*
REGULARITY AND RECOGNITION INTRODUCTION 1. The regularity and recognition of Grand Lodges are separate but allied subjects. Unless a Grand Lodge is regular, it cannot be recognised. Unless a Grand Lodge is recognised, its Brethren cannot (or should not) be met as Freemasons by Brethren of regular and recognised Grand Lodges. BASIC PRINCIPLES 2. The "Basic Principles for Grand Lodge Recognition" were adopted by Grand Lodge in 1929. This was a codification, and not a statement of new principles. summarised the tests which the United Grand Lodge of England had applied and would apply in recognising regular Grand Lodges throughout the World. Eight principles are set out in 'the Book of Constitutions, and restated in Grand Lodge's leaflet "Freemasonry's External Relations" To be eligible for recognition, a Grand Lodge must a. be regular in its origin (see paragraph 3 below) b. be truly independent and self-governing (see paragraph 4 below) c. adhere to 'landmarks' (a landmark is an essential characteristic of regular Freemasonry), viz: (I) its Brethren must believe in a Supreme Being (the GAOTU); (ii) Obligations must be taken on or in full view of the VSL; (iii) it must display the three Great Lights of Freemasonry when it or its Lodges are open; (iv) discussion of religion and politics in its Lodges must be prohibited, and (v) its membership must be male, and it must have nothing to do with mixed or women's Lodges. REGULARITY OF ORIGIN 3. The original Grand Lodges (England, Ireland and Scotland) were formed by private Lodges which had formed themselves Time immemorial Lodges, in English parlance. the 18th Century, three State Grand Lodges in the United States of America were formed by two Lodges, and one was formed by a Grand Convention of Masons Subsequent Grand Lodges follow the modern rule in paragraph 4. 4. A Grand Lodge must have been established by: a) a recognised Grand Lodge, or b) three (nowadays) or more regularly constituted private Lodges, formed in accordance within the rules and customs of a regular Grand Lodge. 5. A Grand Lodge must have undisputed authority over Craft (or basic) Freemasonry within its jurisdiction, and not be subject in any way to or share power with any other Masonic body. 6. This principle is expressed overseas as exclusive Territorial jurisdiction, but has recently been qualified as being "subject to exceptions" This qualification means the principle is not violated if Grand Lodges agree to share territory while remaining authority over Brethren under their jurisdiction (e.g., our recognition of four Grand Lodges in Colombia; the acceptance of the Grand Lodges of New Zealand and South Africa (etc.) of Lodges under the UGLE (etc.) in their territory, and the fact that Lodges under the Grand Lodge of the State of Washington work in the territory of the Grand Lodge of Alaska). Agreement by one Grand Lodge to share its territory with another does not imply license for other Grand Lodges to insert Lodges into the territory of the first Grand Lodge. 7. England's view, of jurisdiction over the Brethren in its constitution regardless of where their Lodges meet, has the merit of simplicity, and is compatible with the territorial view described above. In practice, England does not ignore territorial sovereignty when it considers recognition. RECOGNITION 8. Recognition is a series of bi-lateral relationships between Grand Lodges. If a Grand Lodge seeks recognition from England, and in due course is recognised, the mutual recognition between it and England cannot bind a third Grand Lodge. 9. England's recent policy on recognition has been described as needing to be convinced that it should be granted, rather than noting an absence of reasons why it should no
ReplyDeleteMichael Jackson knew he was gonna die therefore he was ready to claim his spot on the throne like it or nit wtf you think the tour was name (This is It) the fact that he died at 50 yrs is a little debatable ikr,but like La'Toya & Paris & Katherine said MJ stated that "They're gonna kill me for what I love" MJ knew it was his time.The plot was set and Conrad Murray took the blame (Maybe you should consider another Power Force) snuck right before are eyes and SET A PERFECT PLOT.#1Luv
ReplyDelete